THE ELUSIVE CIVIL WAR MORGANS, by Merideth M. Sears
Friday, April 22nd, 2005“The Elusive Civil War Morgans”
by Merideth M. Sears
Written records of individual Morgan horses serving in the Civil War are scarce. Horses were rarely identified unless they were ridden by the principal Generals of the era, like Sheridan Rienzi. Civil War Morgans are noted in the first volume of the American Morgan Horse Registry. Among those mentioned are: Clifton AMHR #457 (killed in 1864), Bemis Horse (killed in battle), Young Gifford (Rifords) (survived), Massachusetts Morgan(used in musters), Gen. Sheridan (Shelburne Morgan) (survived), and Morgan Rattler (captured at Murfreesborough).
In the Middlebury Register in 1886, F. A. Weir identifies two more Morgans as Civil War veterans. Regulator was a line-bred Gifford and sold to a Mr. Johnson in Cincinnati in 1857 or 58. This horse was taken west to Ohio after the war where he died.
Weir also says Morgan Horse (Hunter); a full brother to Regulator was taken to Richmond, Virginia. After the war, Weir received information that this horse had sired many good cavalry horses.
Other documented Civil War Morgan horses include Pink, Col. Hammond’s mount of the Fifth New York Cavalry. Pink survived 88 skirmishes and 34 major battles. When he died from old age, Hammond erected a marker over Pink’s grave inscribed: This horse carried his Master 25 years and was never know to show fatigue, while other horses of cavalry and flying artillery were dying from want of food and exhaustion.
Also surviving from the Fifth New York cavalry were Major Eugene Hayward’s Mink, Lt. Barker’s Prince and Col. James Penfield’s Billy. Morgan horses were often referred to as ‘Billies’ by troops of this era.
Early in the civil war, both the North and the South relied upon individual soldiers to provide their own mounts. The boys of the Fifth New York Cavalry had Captain John Hammond’s father hand-pick and pay the extra charge over the government allowance for their purebred Morgan mounts. Hammond was also a Morgan breeder. No wonder they were mounted solely on Morgan horses!
Very quickly, other procurement officers learned that the best mounts were Morgans and Canadians. While neither breed was large in stature, both had thriftiness and hardiness in their favor. By the fall of 1862, ten thousand Vermont Morgans had been sent to the war. More followed and most never returned. Of the original 1,200 Morgans in the First Vermont Cavalry only 200 survived the war.
The South quickly drained themselves of horseflesh after the Union captured the big horse breeding states of Virginia and Kentucky early in the war. They were never able to re-supply the number of horses they required. Lee pointed out most poignantly at the Appomattox surrender that the only horses the South had were all being ridden by his troops.
The North was plagued more by dishonesty than a shortage, often finding horses they had purchased to be unsuitable or unsound for service. A board of survey found only 76 horses in one group of 416 to be fit for service. The recruits were quickly learning the North was long on draft horses but mighty horse-poor when it came to suitable riding stock.
Most of the horses used in this war never returned, lost to disease, famine, or injury. Many were lost to the simple ignorance of the raw recruits who simply did not know the basic fundamentals of horse care. The number of horses wasted during this period is astounding. One unit of 60,000 men in the field was supplied over 240,000 horses. It was common for a new recruit’s horse to colic when it was watered while hot after an extended march. Such ignorance claimed far more horses of the Northern troops than actual battle fatalities. The experienced horsemen of the South had a decided advantage by knowing how to care for their horses.
Trying to identify individual Morgan horses among the million+ horses used during this period is difficult through photographs or written records. Photos of Civil War horses are scarce except in group shots. Even in the few photos that do exist of horses with their riders, the horse is seldom identified.
A good source for the historian is “The Photographic History of the Civil War, The Cavalry, Volume 4” originally published as a 50th anniversary celebration in 1911. All of the photos that follow are from this book.
HORSES KNOWN TO BE MORGANS
Rienzi. This horse was of the Black Hawk lineage and General Sheridan devoted a page to his memories of this horse when he penned his memoirs. The photography methods of the day did not readily lend themselves to taking photographs of restless animals. Often, a horse will appear to have a ‘phantom’ leg or head movement due to the long exposure time required. Such is the case in this photo in which Rienzi’s rear leg and lower portion of his tail appear to have been ‘retouched’ from the photo. The more logical explanation is that Rienzi was restless and moved, creating a double exposure in that portion of his photograph.